- Lack of terminology (up tp 10 marks)
- Using exampls that are from OLD exemplar responses- this is very lazy amd these stats are now out-dated
- Referencing examples
- Focus on both- AUDIENCE and INSTITUTION
- Hardware and CONTENT
- Own opinion
- By far the biggest error was the lack of specific case study examples; evidence to support claims/ arugements!!! These need specific examples about content, statistics, figures (audience circulation)
Points that should have been covered:
- positive and negative
- advances in technology-can do more, smartphones, iphones, tablets, technology is more accessible/easily available (audiences can access it on the move 24/7), Web 2.0, synergies and convergence
- Software: Apps-specific examples from each institution
- Fanzines: exist now due to proliferation in hardware and software and their accessibilty- examples: Audience: more demanding; they can prosume through sites such as youtube so they expect more from institutions, impatient
- how have institutions responded to these constant changing consumer/consumption habits?
- Rise in competition due to proliferation of hardware (Twitter, fanzines etc) and how institutions have overcome this?
- Production & distribution; advancements in printing process- has the internet meant a decrease in sale of institutions print products?
Refer to Alexa's web traffic
No comments:
Post a Comment